Deacon Keith Fournier’s opinion article “The Media Exploits a fallen priest“, written before Fr Cutie’s departure from the Church, contains some interesting observations (emphases and comments are mine):
The real story behind this fall in the life of this celibate priest is the media feeding frenzy (true, but the scandal is real and genuine). The secular press has used it to attack the countercultural witness of consecrated celibacy in Catholic life. Fr. Cutie was exceedingly popular and is a very gifted communicator. He was the head of the Archdiocese of Miami’s Radio Paz and Radio Peace broadcasts and loved by the faithful. He has been affectionately named “Father Oprah” because he dispensed advice for people in relationships on Radio and in his syndicated column. He also authored a popular book entitled “Real Life, Real Love: 7 Paths to a Strong, Lasting Relationship.” Celibacy was not the “cause” of Fr. Cutie’s sin (Hear! Hear!).
The reports demonstrate the agenda; using this story of a priest who broke his vows as an opportunity for talking heads and ill informed pundits to mock the Catholic Church. Many have presented the vocation of consecrated celibacy as an “antiquated practice.” They made smug comments about how “behind the times” the Catholic Church is and how long it will take to change such outdated practices. They even took polls! All of this has nothing to do with the facts of this story – a young celibate priest sinned (the Reverend Deacon is cutting through the piffle with the axe of common sense). He broke his vows and had an affair with a woman. This came to light when he and that woman were photographed in inappropriate behavior (let’s be clear, it was inappropriate behaviour… there has been much sympathy for Fr Cutie, arguing from the emotive reality that he fell in love. That is as may be, but we cannot avoid the fact that the Reverend Father’s behaviour was unacceptable).
This has become a platform from which some who do not understand the Catholic Church and others who do not like it have chosen to attack a practice which is a part of the history of Christianity. All of the discredited claims concerning how the discipline of celibacy in the Catholic Church came about are once again being presented to the public as ‘facts’. You have heard the most prevalent- that celibacy wasn’t imposed in the Church until the 6th (or 9th, or 10th) century and that the motive for imposing celibacy was to prevent Church property from being inherited by the children of the clergy. Both fall short of the truth. The witness of consecrated celibacy “for the sake of the kingdom” goes back to the invitation of Jesus Christ (Matthew 19:12). It is bolstered by the witness of some of the Apostles and encouraged by their pastoral experience (see, e.g. 1 Corinthians 7) of the early Church. It is a gift and treasure for those who embrace it and for the Church which has been deeply enriched by their witness (again, I am pleased to see this being noted. Celibate chastity is emphatically not an onerous obligation forced upon Catholic Priests. It is a vocation – a gift freely given and freely received).
This way of life was even more “counter cultural” in the Semitic world of the time of Jesus than it is today in the West (Yes! When Paul encourages celibate chastity he is doing it in a culture conditioned by a condemnation of celibate chastity. So counter-cultural was celibate chastity many Jewish scholars have a great deal of trouble accepting Christ did not marry). The prophetic witness of voluntary celibacy has endured beyond the ranks of celibate clergy for over two millennia (Wonderful! Many people who are not priests, choose to be celibate, let us not forget this!). It is flourishing in the inspired vowed life of monastic orders and the sacrificial witness of religious men and women. It is experiencing a great renewal in our day in the new “ecclesial movements”, the associations of lay men and woman serving the Church in and through their daily work in the world. Many of them have chosen celibacy, not to avoid marriage, but to live as a prophetic sign of the kingdom and be more available for mission and ministry.
Rev’d Mr Fournier’s article is well worth reading. My continued interest in this story is not one of wishing to “point the finger” at Alberto Cutie, but a desire to expose some of the fallacies of the media’s reporting.
Our Novena for Priests continues.
We continue to hope and pray for Fr Cutie, hoping for peace and reconcilation in the spirit of Archbishop Favalora’s statement.